Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on math fundamentals.
You are given an integer n and an integer start.
Define an array nums where nums[i] = start + 2 * i (0-indexed) and n == nums.length.
Return the bitwise XOR of all elements of nums.
Example 1:
Input: n = 5, start = 0 Output: 8 Explanation: Array nums is equal to [0, 2, 4, 6, 8] where (0 ^ 2 ^ 4 ^ 6 ^ 8) = 8. Where "^" corresponds to bitwise XOR operator.
Example 2:
Input: n = 4, start = 3 Output: 8 Explanation: Array nums is equal to [3, 5, 7, 9] where (3 ^ 5 ^ 7 ^ 9) = 8.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 10000 <= start <= 1000n == nums.lengthProblem summary: You are given an integer n and an integer start. Define an array nums where nums[i] = start + 2 * i (0-indexed) and n == nums.length. Return the bitwise XOR of all elements of nums.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math · Bit Manipulation
5 0
4 3
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1486: XOR Operation in an Array
class Solution {
public int xorOperation(int n, int start) {
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ans ^= start + 2 * i;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1486: XOR Operation in an Array
func xorOperation(n int, start int) (ans int) {
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
ans ^= start + 2*i
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1486: XOR Operation in an Array
class Solution:
def xorOperation(self, n: int, start: int) -> int:
return reduce(xor, ((start + 2 * i) for i in range(n)))
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1486: XOR Operation in an Array
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn xor_operation(n: i32, start: i32) -> i32 {
(0..n).fold(0, |acc, i| acc ^ (start + 2 * i))
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let n = 5;
let start = 0;
let res = 8;
assert_eq!(Solution::xor_operation(n, start), res);
let n = 4;
let start = 3;
let res = 8;
assert_eq!(Solution::xor_operation(n, start), res);
let n = 1;
let start = 7;
let res = 7;
assert_eq!(Solution::xor_operation(n, start), res);
let n = 10;
let start = 5;
let res = 2;
assert_eq!(Solution::xor_operation(n, start), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1486: XOR Operation in an Array
function xorOperation(n: number, start: number): number {
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ans ^= start + 2 * i;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.