Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using math strategy.
You are given an integer num. You will apply the following steps to num two separate times:
x (0 <= x <= 9).y (0 <= y <= 9). Note y can be equal to x.x in the decimal representation of num by y.Let a and b be the two results from applying the operation to num independently.
Return the max difference between a and b.
Note that neither a nor b may have any leading zeros, and must not be 0.
Example 1:
Input: num = 555 Output: 888 Explanation: The first time pick x = 5 and y = 9 and store the new integer in a. The second time pick x = 5 and y = 1 and store the new integer in b. We have now a = 999 and b = 111 and max difference = 888
Example 2:
Input: num = 9 Output: 8 Explanation: The first time pick x = 9 and y = 9 and store the new integer in a. The second time pick x = 9 and y = 1 and store the new integer in b. We have now a = 9 and b = 1 and max difference = 8
Constraints:
1 <= num <= 108Problem summary: You are given an integer num. You will apply the following steps to num two separate times: Pick a digit x (0 <= x <= 9). Pick another digit y (0 <= y <= 9). Note y can be equal to x. Replace all the occurrences of x in the decimal representation of num by y. Let a and b be the two results from applying the operation to num independently. Return the max difference between a and b. Note that neither a nor b may have any leading zeros, and must not be 0.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math · Greedy
555
9
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1432: Max Difference You Can Get From Changing an Integer
class Solution {
public int maxDiff(int num) {
String a = String.valueOf(num);
String b = a;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length(); ++i) {
if (a.charAt(i) != '9') {
a = a.replace(a.charAt(i), '9');
break;
}
}
if (b.charAt(0) != '1') {
b = b.replace(b.charAt(0), '1');
} else {
for (int i = 1; i < b.length(); ++i) {
if (b.charAt(i) != '0' && b.charAt(i) != '1') {
b = b.replace(b.charAt(i), '0');
break;
}
}
}
return Integer.parseInt(a) - Integer.parseInt(b);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1432: Max Difference You Can Get From Changing an Integer
func maxDiff(num int) int {
a, b := num, num
s := strconv.Itoa(num)
for i := range s {
if s[i] != '9' {
a, _ = strconv.Atoi(strings.ReplaceAll(s, string(s[i]), "9"))
break
}
}
if s[0] > '1' {
b, _ = strconv.Atoi(strings.ReplaceAll(s, string(s[0]), "1"))
} else {
for i := 1; i < len(s); i++ {
if s[i] != '0' && s[i] != '1' {
b, _ = strconv.Atoi(strings.ReplaceAll(s, string(s[i]), "0"))
break
}
}
}
return a - b
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1432: Max Difference You Can Get From Changing an Integer
class Solution:
def maxDiff(self, num: int) -> int:
a, b = str(num), str(num)
for c in a:
if c != "9":
a = a.replace(c, "9")
break
if b[0] != "1":
b = b.replace(b[0], "1")
else:
for c in b[1:]:
if c not in "01":
b = b.replace(c, "0")
break
return int(a) - int(b)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1432: Max Difference You Can Get From Changing an Integer
impl Solution {
pub fn max_diff(num: i32) -> i32 {
let a = num.to_string();
let mut a = a.clone();
let mut b = a.clone();
for c in a.chars() {
if c != '9' {
a = a.replace(c, "9");
break;
}
}
let chars: Vec<char> = b.chars().collect();
if chars[0] != '1' {
b = b.replace(chars[0], "1");
} else {
for &c in &chars[1..] {
if c != '0' && c != '1' {
b = b.replace(c, "0");
break;
}
}
}
a.parse::<i32>().unwrap() - b.parse::<i32>().unwrap()
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1432: Max Difference You Can Get From Changing an Integer
function maxDiff(num: number): number {
let a = num.toString();
let b = a;
for (let i = 0; i < a.length; ++i) {
if (a[i] !== '9') {
a = a.split(a[i]).join('9');
break;
}
}
if (b[0] !== '1') {
b = b.split(b[0]).join('1');
} else {
for (let i = 1; i < b.length; ++i) {
if (b[i] !== '0' && b[i] !== '1') {
b = b.split(b[i]).join('0');
break;
}
}
}
return +a - +b;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.