Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
You are given the string croakOfFrogs, which represents a combination of the string "croak" from different frogs, that is, multiple frogs can croak at the same time, so multiple "croak" are mixed.
Return the minimum number of different frogs to finish all the croaks in the given string.
A valid "croak" means a frog is printing five letters 'c', 'r', 'o', 'a', and 'k' sequentially. The frogs have to print all five letters to finish a croak. If the given string is not a combination of a valid "croak" return -1.
Example 1:
Input: croakOfFrogs = "croakcroak" Output: 1 Explanation: One frog yelling "croak" twice.
Example 2:
Input: croakOfFrogs = "crcoakroak" Output: 2 Explanation: The minimum number of frogs is two. The first frog could yell "crcoakroak". The second frog could yell later "crcoakroak".
Example 3:
Input: croakOfFrogs = "croakcrook" Output: -1 Explanation: The given string is an invalid combination of "croak" from different frogs.
Constraints:
1 <= croakOfFrogs.length <= 105croakOfFrogs is either 'c', 'r', 'o', 'a', or 'k'.Problem summary: You are given the string croakOfFrogs, which represents a combination of the string "croak" from different frogs, that is, multiple frogs can croak at the same time, so multiple "croak" are mixed. Return the minimum number of different frogs to finish all the croaks in the given string. A valid "croak" means a frog is printing five letters 'c', 'r', 'o', 'a', and 'k' sequentially. The frogs have to print all five letters to finish a croak. If the given string is not a combination of a valid "croak" return -1.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
"croakcroak"
"crcoakroak"
"croakcrook"
divide-intervals-into-minimum-number-of-groups)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1419: Minimum Number of Frogs Croaking
class Solution {
public int minNumberOfFrogs(String croakOfFrogs) {
int n = croakOfFrogs.length();
if (n % 5 != 0) {
return -1;
}
int[] idx = new int[26];
String s = "croak";
for (int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
idx[s.charAt(i) - 'a'] = i;
}
int[] cnt = new int[5];
int ans = 0, x = 0;
for (int k = 0; k < n; ++k) {
int i = idx[croakOfFrogs.charAt(k) - 'a'];
++cnt[i];
if (i == 0) {
ans = Math.max(ans, ++x);
} else {
if (--cnt[i - 1] < 0) {
return -1;
}
if (i == 4) {
--x;
}
}
}
return x > 0 ? -1 : ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1419: Minimum Number of Frogs Croaking
func minNumberOfFrogs(croakOfFrogs string) int {
n := len(croakOfFrogs)
if n%5 != 0 {
return -1
}
idx := [26]int{}
for i, c := range "croak" {
idx[c-'a'] = i
}
cnt := [5]int{}
ans, x := 0, 0
for _, c := range croakOfFrogs {
i := idx[c-'a']
cnt[i]++
if i == 0 {
x++
ans = max(ans, x)
} else {
cnt[i-1]--
if cnt[i-1] < 0 {
return -1
}
if i == 4 {
x--
}
}
}
if x > 0 {
return -1
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1419: Minimum Number of Frogs Croaking
class Solution:
def minNumberOfFrogs(self, croakOfFrogs: str) -> int:
if len(croakOfFrogs) % 5 != 0:
return -1
idx = {c: i for i, c in enumerate('croak')}
cnt = [0] * 5
ans = x = 0
for i in map(idx.get, croakOfFrogs):
cnt[i] += 1
if i == 0:
x += 1
ans = max(ans, x)
else:
if cnt[i - 1] == 0:
return -1
cnt[i - 1] -= 1
if i == 4:
x -= 1
return -1 if x else ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1419: Minimum Number of Frogs Croaking
struct Solution;
use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
fn min_number_of_frogs(croak_of_frogs: String) -> i32 {
if croak_of_frogs.len() % 5 != 0 {
return -1;
}
let mut id: HashMap<char, usize> = HashMap::new();
for &c in &['c', 'r', 'o', 'a', 'k'] {
id.insert(c, id.len());
}
let mut count = vec![0; 5];
let mut frogs = 0;
let mut res = 0;
for c in croak_of_frogs.chars() {
let i = id[&c];
count[i] += 1;
if i == 0 {
frogs += 1;
res = res.max(frogs);
}
if i > 0 {
if count[i - 1] < count[i] {
return -1;
}
}
if i == 4 {
frogs -= 1;
}
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let croak_of_frogs = "croakcroak".to_string();
let res = 1;
assert_eq!(Solution::min_number_of_frogs(croak_of_frogs), res);
let croak_of_frogs = "crcoakroak".to_string();
let res = 2;
assert_eq!(Solution::min_number_of_frogs(croak_of_frogs), res);
let croak_of_frogs = "croakcrook".to_string();
let res = -1;
assert_eq!(Solution::min_number_of_frogs(croak_of_frogs), res);
let croak_of_frogs = "croakcroa".to_string();
let res = -1;
assert_eq!(Solution::min_number_of_frogs(croak_of_frogs), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1419: Minimum Number of Frogs Croaking
function minNumberOfFrogs(croakOfFrogs: string): number {
const n = croakOfFrogs.length;
if (n % 5 !== 0) {
return -1;
}
const idx = (c: string): number => 'croak'.indexOf(c);
const cnt: number[] = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0];
let ans = 0;
let x = 0;
for (const c of croakOfFrogs) {
const i = idx(c);
++cnt[i];
if (i === 0) {
ans = Math.max(ans, ++x);
} else {
if (--cnt[i - 1] < 0) {
return -1;
}
if (i === 4) {
--x;
}
}
}
return x > 0 ? -1 : ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.