Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
Given the array orders, which represents the orders that customers have done in a restaurant. More specifically orders[i]=[customerNamei,tableNumberi,foodItemi] where customerNamei is the name of the customer, tableNumberi is the table customer sit at, and foodItemi is the item customer orders.
Return the restaurant's “display table”. The “display table” is a table whose row entries denote how many of each food item each table ordered. The first column is the table number and the remaining columns correspond to each food item in alphabetical order. The first row should be a header whose first column is “Table”, followed by the names of the food items. Note that the customer names are not part of the table. Additionally, the rows should be sorted in numerically increasing order.
Example 1:
Input: orders = [["David","3","Ceviche"],["Corina","10","Beef Burrito"],["David","3","Fried Chicken"],["Carla","5","Water"],["Carla","5","Ceviche"],["Rous","3","Ceviche"]] Output: [["Table","Beef Burrito","Ceviche","Fried Chicken","Water"],["3","0","2","1","0"],["5","0","1","0","1"],["10","1","0","0","0"]] Explanation: The displaying table looks like: Table,Beef Burrito,Ceviche,Fried Chicken,Water 3 ,0 ,2 ,1 ,0 5 ,0 ,1 ,0 ,1 10 ,1 ,0 ,0 ,0 For the table 3: David orders "Ceviche" and "Fried Chicken", and Rous orders "Ceviche". For the table 5: Carla orders "Water" and "Ceviche". For the table 10: Corina orders "Beef Burrito".
Example 2:
Input: orders = [["James","12","Fried Chicken"],["Ratesh","12","Fried Chicken"],["Amadeus","12","Fried Chicken"],["Adam","1","Canadian Waffles"],["Brianna","1","Canadian Waffles"]] Output: [["Table","Canadian Waffles","Fried Chicken"],["1","2","0"],["12","0","3"]] Explanation: For the table 1: Adam and Brianna order "Canadian Waffles". For the table 12: James, Ratesh and Amadeus order "Fried Chicken".
Example 3:
Input: orders = [["Laura","2","Bean Burrito"],["Jhon","2","Beef Burrito"],["Melissa","2","Soda"]] Output: [["Table","Bean Burrito","Beef Burrito","Soda"],["2","1","1","1"]]
Constraints:
1 <= orders.length <= 5 * 10^4orders[i].length == 31 <= customerNamei.length, foodItemi.length <= 20customerNamei and foodItemi consist of lowercase and uppercase English letters and the space character.tableNumberi is a valid integer between 1 and 500.Problem summary: Given the array orders, which represents the orders that customers have done in a restaurant. More specifically orders[i]=[customerNamei,tableNumberi,foodItemi] where customerNamei is the name of the customer, tableNumberi is the table customer sit at, and foodItemi is the item customer orders. Return the restaurant's “display table”. The “display table” is a table whose row entries denote how many of each food item each table ordered. The first column is the table number and the remaining columns correspond to each food item in alphabetical order. The first row should be a header whose first column is “Table”, followed by the names of the food items. Note that the customer names are not part of the table. Additionally, the rows should be sorted in numerically increasing order.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Segment Tree
[["David","3","Ceviche"],["Corina","10","Beef Burrito"],["David","3","Fried Chicken"],["Carla","5","Water"],["Carla","5","Ceviche"],["Rous","3","Ceviche"]]
[["James","12","Fried Chicken"],["Ratesh","12","Fried Chicken"],["Amadeus","12","Fried Chicken"],["Adam","1","Canadian Waffles"],["Brianna","1","Canadian Waffles"]]
[["Laura","2","Bean Burrito"],["Jhon","2","Beef Burrito"],["Melissa","2","Soda"]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1418: Display Table of Food Orders in a Restaurant
class Solution {
public List<List<String>> displayTable(List<List<String>> orders) {
TreeMap<Integer, List<String>> tables = new TreeMap<>();
Set<String> items = new HashSet<>();
for (List<String> o : orders) {
int table = Integer.parseInt(o.get(1));
String foodItem = o.get(2);
tables.computeIfAbsent(table, k -> new ArrayList<>()).add(foodItem);
items.add(foodItem);
}
List<String> sortedItems = new ArrayList<>(items);
Collections.sort(sortedItems);
List<List<String>> ans = new ArrayList<>();
List<String> header = new ArrayList<>();
header.add("Table");
header.addAll(sortedItems);
ans.add(header);
for (Map.Entry<Integer, List<String>> entry : tables.entrySet()) {
Map<String, Integer> cnt = new HashMap<>();
for (String item : entry.getValue()) {
cnt.merge(item, 1, Integer::sum);
}
List<String> row = new ArrayList<>();
row.add(String.valueOf(entry.getKey()));
for (String item : sortedItems) {
row.add(String.valueOf(cnt.getOrDefault(item, 0)));
}
ans.add(row);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1418: Display Table of Food Orders in a Restaurant
func displayTable(orders [][]string) [][]string {
tables := make(map[int]map[string]int)
items := make(map[string]bool)
for _, order := range orders {
table, _ := strconv.Atoi(order[1])
foodItem := order[2]
if tables[table] == nil {
tables[table] = make(map[string]int)
}
tables[table][foodItem]++
items[foodItem] = true
}
sortedItems := make([]string, 0, len(items))
for item := range items {
sortedItems = append(sortedItems, item)
}
sort.Strings(sortedItems)
ans := [][]string{}
header := append([]string{"Table"}, sortedItems...)
ans = append(ans, header)
tableNums := make([]int, 0, len(tables))
for table := range tables {
tableNums = append(tableNums, table)
}
sort.Ints(tableNums)
for _, table := range tableNums {
row := []string{strconv.Itoa(table)}
for _, item := range sortedItems {
count := tables[table][item]
row = append(row, strconv.Itoa(count))
}
ans = append(ans, row)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1418: Display Table of Food Orders in a Restaurant
class Solution:
def displayTable(self, orders: List[List[str]]) -> List[List[str]]:
tables = defaultdict(list)
items = set()
for _, table, foodItem in orders:
tables[int(table)].append(foodItem)
items.add(foodItem)
sorted_items = sorted(items)
ans = [["Table"] + sorted_items]
for table in sorted(tables):
cnt = Counter(tables[table])
row = [str(table)] + [str(cnt[item]) for item in sorted_items]
ans.append(row)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1418: Display Table of Food Orders in a Restaurant
struct Solution;
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
fn display_table(orders: Vec<Vec<String>>) -> Vec<Vec<String>> {
let mut tables: BTreeSet<i32> = BTreeSet::new();
let mut foods: BTreeSet<&str> = BTreeSet::new();
let mut counts: HashMap<i32, HashMap<&str, usize>> = HashMap::new();
for order in &orders {
let table = order[1].parse::<i32>().unwrap();
let food = &order[2];
tables.insert(table);
foods.insert(food);
*counts.entry(table).or_default().entry(food).or_default() += 1;
}
let mut res = vec![vec!["Table".to_string()]];
for food in foods.iter() {
res[0].push((*food).to_string());
}
for table in tables {
let mut row = vec![table.to_string()];
for food in &foods {
if let Some(counts) = counts.get(&table) {
if let Some(count) = counts.get(food) {
row.push(count.to_string());
} else {
row.push("0".to_string());
}
} else {
row.push("0".to_string());
}
}
res.push(row);
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let orders = vec_vec_string![
["David", "3", "Ceviche"],
["Corina", "10", "Beef Burrito"],
["David", "3", "Fried Chicken"],
["Carla", "5", "Water"],
["Carla", "5", "Ceviche"],
["Rous", "3", "Ceviche"]
];
let res = vec_vec_string![
["Table", "Beef Burrito", "Ceviche", "Fried Chicken", "Water"],
["3", "0", "2", "1", "0"],
["5", "0", "1", "0", "1"],
["10", "1", "0", "0", "0"]
];
assert_eq!(Solution::display_table(orders), res);
let orders = vec_vec_string![
["James", "12", "Fried Chicken"],
["Ratesh", "12", "Fried Chicken"],
["Amadeus", "12", "Fried Chicken"],
["Adam", "1", "Canadian Waffles"],
["Brianna", "1", "Canadian Waffles"]
];
let res = vec_vec_string![
["Table", "Canadian Waffles", "Fried Chicken"],
["1", "2", "0"],
["12", "0", "3"]
];
assert_eq!(Solution::display_table(orders), res);
let orders = vec_vec_string![
["Laura", "2", "Bean Burrito"],
["Jhon", "2", "Beef Burrito"],
["Melissa", "2", "Soda"]
];
let res = vec_vec_string![
["Table", "Bean Burrito", "Beef Burrito", "Soda"],
["2", "1", "1", "1"]
];
assert_eq!(Solution::display_table(orders), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1418: Display Table of Food Orders in a Restaurant
function displayTable(orders: string[][]): string[][] {
const tables: Record<number, Record<string, number>> = {};
const items: Set<string> = new Set();
for (const [_, table, foodItem] of orders) {
const t = +table;
if (!tables[t]) {
tables[t] = {};
}
if (!tables[t][foodItem]) {
tables[t][foodItem] = 0;
}
tables[t][foodItem]++;
items.add(foodItem);
}
const sortedItems = Array.from(items).sort();
const ans: string[][] = [];
const header: string[] = ['Table', ...sortedItems];
ans.push(header);
const sortedTableNumbers = Object.keys(tables)
.map(Number)
.sort((a, b) => a - b);
for (const table of sortedTableNumbers) {
const row: string[] = [table.toString()];
for (const item of sortedItems) {
row.push((tables[table][item] || 0).toString());
}
ans.push(row);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
For each of q queries, scan the entire range to compute the aggregate (sum, min, max). Each range scan takes up to O(n) for a full-array query. With q queries: O(n × q) total. Point updates are O(1) but queries dominate.
Building the tree is O(n). Each query or update traverses O(log n) nodes (tree height). For q queries: O(n + q log n) total. Space is O(4n) ≈ O(n) for the tree array. Lazy propagation adds O(1) per node for deferred updates.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.