LeetCode #1368 — HARD

Minimum Cost to Make at Least One Valid Path in a Grid

Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

Given an m x n grid. Each cell of the grid has a sign pointing to the next cell you should visit if you are currently in this cell. The sign of grid[i][j] can be:

  • 1 which means go to the cell to the right. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i][j + 1])
  • 2 which means go to the cell to the left. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i][j - 1])
  • 3 which means go to the lower cell. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i + 1][j])
  • 4 which means go to the upper cell. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i - 1][j])

Notice that there could be some signs on the cells of the grid that point outside the grid.

You will initially start at the upper left cell (0, 0). A valid path in the grid is a path that starts from the upper left cell (0, 0) and ends at the bottom-right cell (m - 1, n - 1) following the signs on the grid. The valid path does not have to be the shortest.

You can modify the sign on a cell with cost = 1. You can modify the sign on a cell one time only.

Return the minimum cost to make the grid have at least one valid path.

Example 1:

Input: grid = [[1,1,1,1],[2,2,2,2],[1,1,1,1],[2,2,2,2]]
Output: 3
Explanation: You will start at point (0, 0).
The path to (3, 3) is as follows. (0, 0) --> (0, 1) --> (0, 2) --> (0, 3) change the arrow to down with cost = 1 --> (1, 3) --> (1, 2) --> (1, 1) --> (1, 0) change the arrow to down with cost = 1 --> (2, 0) --> (2, 1) --> (2, 2) --> (2, 3) change the arrow to down with cost = 1 --> (3, 3)
The total cost = 3.

Example 2:

Input: grid = [[1,1,3],[3,2,2],[1,1,4]]
Output: 0
Explanation: You can follow the path from (0, 0) to (2, 2).

Example 3:

Input: grid = [[1,2],[4,3]]
Output: 1

Constraints:

  • m == grid.length
  • n == grid[i].length
  • 1 <= m, n <= 100
  • 1 <= grid[i][j] <= 4

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: Given an m x n grid. Each cell of the grid has a sign pointing to the next cell you should visit if you are currently in this cell. The sign of grid[i][j] can be: 1 which means go to the cell to the right. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i][j + 1]) 2 which means go to the cell to the left. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i][j - 1]) 3 which means go to the lower cell. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i + 1][j]) 4 which means go to the upper cell. (i.e go from grid[i][j] to grid[i - 1][j]) Notice that there could be some signs on the cells of the grid that point outside the grid. You will initially start at the upper left cell (0, 0). A valid path in the grid is a path that starts from the upper left cell (0, 0) and ends at the bottom-right cell (m - 1, n - 1) following the signs on the grid. The valid path does not have to be the shortest. You can modify the sign on a cell with cost = 1.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array

Example 1

[[1,1,1,1],[2,2,2,2],[1,1,1,1],[2,2,2,2]]

Example 2

[[1,1,3],[3,2,2],[1,1,4]]

Example 3

[[1,2],[4,3]]

Related Problems

  • Minimum Weighted Subgraph With the Required Paths (minimum-weighted-subgraph-with-the-required-paths)
  • Disconnect Path in a Binary Matrix by at Most One Flip (disconnect-path-in-a-binary-matrix-by-at-most-one-flip)
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • Build a graph where grid[i][j] is connected to all the four side-adjacent cells with weighted edge. the weight is 0 if the sign is pointing to the adjacent cell or 1 otherwise.
  • Do BFS from (0, 0) visit all edges with weight = 0 first. the answer is the distance to (m -1, n - 1).
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Largest constraint values
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1368: Minimum Cost to Make at Least One Valid Path in a Grid
class Solution {
    public int minCost(int[][] grid) {
        int m = grid.length, n = grid[0].length;
        boolean[][] vis = new boolean[m][n];
        Deque<int[]> q = new ArrayDeque<>();
        q.offer(new int[] {0, 0, 0});
        int[][] dirs = {{0, 0}, {0, 1}, {0, -1}, {1, 0}, {-1, 0}};
        while (!q.isEmpty()) {
            int[] p = q.poll();
            int i = p[0], j = p[1], d = p[2];
            if (i == m - 1 && j == n - 1) {
                return d;
            }
            if (vis[i][j]) {
                continue;
            }
            vis[i][j] = true;
            for (int k = 1; k <= 4; ++k) {
                int x = i + dirs[k][0], y = j + dirs[k][1];
                if (x >= 0 && x < m && y >= 0 && y < n) {
                    if (grid[i][j] == k) {
                        q.offerFirst(new int[] {x, y, d});
                    } else {
                        q.offer(new int[] {x, y, d + 1});
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n)
Space
O(1)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE
O(n²) time
O(1) space

Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.

OPTIMIZED
O(n) time
O(1) space

Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.

Shortcut: If you are using nested loops on an array, there is almost always an O(n) solution. Look for the right auxiliary state.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.