Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given an array target of n integers. From a starting array arr consisting of n 1's, you may perform the following procedure :
x be the sum of all elements currently in your array.i, such that 0 <= i < n and set the value of arr at index i to x.Return true if it is possible to construct the target array from arr, otherwise, return false.
Example 1:
Input: target = [9,3,5] Output: true Explanation: Start with arr = [1, 1, 1] [1, 1, 1], sum = 3 choose index 1 [1, 3, 1], sum = 5 choose index 2 [1, 3, 5], sum = 9 choose index 0 [9, 3, 5] Done
Example 2:
Input: target = [1,1,1,2] Output: false Explanation: Impossible to create target array from [1,1,1,1].
Example 3:
Input: target = [8,5] Output: true
Constraints:
n == target.length1 <= n <= 5 * 1041 <= target[i] <= 109Problem summary: You are given an array target of n integers. From a starting array arr consisting of n 1's, you may perform the following procedure : let x be the sum of all elements currently in your array. choose index i, such that 0 <= i < n and set the value of arr at index i to x. You may repeat this procedure as many times as needed. Return true if it is possible to construct the target array from arr, otherwise, return false.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[9,3,5]
[1,1,1,2]
[8,5]
minimum-amount-of-time-to-fill-cups)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1354: Construct Target Array With Multiple Sums
class Solution {
public boolean isPossible(int[] target) {
PriorityQueue<Long> pq = new PriorityQueue<>(Collections.reverseOrder());
long s = 0;
for (int x : target) {
s += x;
pq.offer((long) x);
}
while (pq.peek() > 1) {
long mx = pq.poll();
long t = s - mx;
if (t == 0 || mx - t < 1) {
return false;
}
long x = mx % t;
if (x == 0) {
x = t;
}
pq.offer(x);
s = s - mx + x;
}
return true;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1354: Construct Target Array With Multiple Sums
func isPossible(target []int) bool {
pq := &hp{target}
s := 0
for _, x := range target {
s += x
}
heap.Init(pq)
for target[0] > 1 {
mx := target[0]
t := s - mx
if t < 1 || mx-t < 1 {
return false
}
x := mx % t
if x == 0 {
x = t
}
target[0] = x
heap.Fix(pq, 0)
s = s - mx + x
}
return true
}
type hp struct{ sort.IntSlice }
func (h hp) Less(i, j int) bool { return h.IntSlice[i] > h.IntSlice[j] }
func (hp) Pop() (_ any) { return }
func (hp) Push(any) {}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1354: Construct Target Array With Multiple Sums
class Solution:
def isPossible(self, target: List[int]) -> bool:
s = sum(target)
pq = [-x for x in target]
heapify(pq)
while -pq[0] > 1:
mx = -heappop(pq)
t = s - mx
if t == 0 or mx - t < 1:
return False
x = (mx % t) or t
heappush(pq, -x)
s = s - mx + x
return True
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1354: Construct Target Array With Multiple Sums
use std::collections::BinaryHeap;
impl Solution {
pub fn is_possible(target: Vec<i32>) -> bool {
let mut pq = BinaryHeap::from(target.clone());
let mut s: i64 = target.iter().map(|&x| x as i64).sum();
while let Some(&mx) = pq.peek() {
if mx == 1 {
break;
}
let mx = pq.pop().unwrap() as i64;
let t = s - mx;
if t < 1 || mx - t < 1 {
return false;
}
let x = if mx % t == 0 { t } else { mx % t };
pq.push(x as i32);
s = s - mx + x;
}
true
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1354: Construct Target Array With Multiple Sums
function isPossible(target: number[]): boolean {
const pq = new MaxPriorityQueue<number>();
let s = 0;
for (const x of target) {
s += x;
pq.enqueue(x);
}
while (pq.front() > 1) {
const mx = pq.dequeue();
const t = s - mx;
if (t < 1 || mx - t < 1) {
return false;
}
const x = mx % t || t;
pq.enqueue(x);
s = s - mx + x;
}
return true;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.