Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
There are n children standing in a line. Each child is assigned a rating value given in the integer array ratings.
You are giving candies to these children subjected to the following requirements:
Return the minimum number of candies you need to have to distribute the candies to the children.
Example 1:
Input: ratings = [1,0,2] Output: 5 Explanation: You can allocate to the first, second and third child with 2, 1, 2 candies respectively.
Example 2:
Input: ratings = [1,2,2] Output: 4 Explanation: You can allocate to the first, second and third child with 1, 2, 1 candies respectively. The third child gets 1 candy because it satisfies the above two conditions.
Constraints:
n == ratings.length1 <= n <= 2 * 1040 <= ratings[i] <= 2 * 104Problem summary: There are n children standing in a line. Each child is assigned a rating value given in the integer array ratings. You are giving candies to these children subjected to the following requirements: Each child must have at least one candy. Children with a higher rating get more candies than their neighbors. Return the minimum number of candies you need to have to distribute the candies to the children.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
[1,0,2]
[1,2,2]
minimize-maximum-value-in-a-grid)minimum-number-of-operations-to-satisfy-conditions)check-if-grid-satisfies-conditions)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #135: Candy
class Solution {
public int candy(int[] ratings) {
int n = ratings.length;
int[] left = new int[n];
int[] right = new int[n];
Arrays.fill(left, 1);
Arrays.fill(right, 1);
for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
if (ratings[i] > ratings[i - 1]) {
left[i] = left[i - 1] + 1;
}
}
for (int i = n - 2; i >= 0; --i) {
if (ratings[i] > ratings[i + 1]) {
right[i] = right[i + 1] + 1;
}
}
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ans += Math.max(left[i], right[i]);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #135: Candy
func candy(ratings []int) int {
n := len(ratings)
left := make([]int, n)
right := make([]int, n)
for i := range left {
left[i] = 1
right[i] = 1
}
for i := 1; i < n; i++ {
if ratings[i] > ratings[i-1] {
left[i] = left[i-1] + 1
}
}
for i := n - 2; i >= 0; i-- {
if ratings[i] > ratings[i+1] {
right[i] = right[i+1] + 1
}
}
ans := 0
for i, a := range left {
b := right[i]
ans += max(a, b)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #135: Candy
class Solution:
def candy(self, ratings: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(ratings)
left = [1] * n
right = [1] * n
for i in range(1, n):
if ratings[i] > ratings[i - 1]:
left[i] = left[i - 1] + 1
for i in range(n - 2, -1, -1):
if ratings[i] > ratings[i + 1]:
right[i] = right[i + 1] + 1
return sum(max(a, b) for a, b in zip(left, right))
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #135: Candy
impl Solution {
pub fn candy(ratings: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let n = ratings.len();
let mut left = vec![1; n];
let mut right = vec![1; n];
for i in 1..n {
if ratings[i] > ratings[i - 1] {
left[i] = left[i - 1] + 1;
}
}
for i in (0..n - 1).rev() {
if ratings[i] > ratings[i + 1] {
right[i] = right[i + 1] + 1;
}
}
ratings
.iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(i, _)| left[i].max(right[i]) as i32)
.sum()
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #135: Candy
function candy(ratings: number[]): number {
const n = ratings.length;
const left = new Array(n).fill(1);
const right = new Array(n).fill(1);
for (let i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
if (ratings[i] > ratings[i - 1]) {
left[i] = left[i - 1] + 1;
}
}
for (let i = n - 2; i >= 0; --i) {
if (ratings[i] > ratings[i + 1]) {
right[i] = right[i + 1] + 1;
}
}
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ans += Math.max(left[i], right[i]);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.