LeetCode #1297 — MEDIUM

Maximum Number of Occurrences of a Substring

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using hash map strategy.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

Given a string s, return the maximum number of occurrences of any substring under the following rules:

  • The number of unique characters in the substring must be less than or equal to maxLetters.
  • The substring size must be between minSize and maxSize inclusive.

Example 1:

Input: s = "aababcaab", maxLetters = 2, minSize = 3, maxSize = 4
Output: 2
Explanation: Substring "aab" has 2 occurrences in the original string.
It satisfies the conditions, 2 unique letters and size 3 (between minSize and maxSize).

Example 2:

Input: s = "aaaa", maxLetters = 1, minSize = 3, maxSize = 3
Output: 2
Explanation: Substring "aaa" occur 2 times in the string. It can overlap.

Constraints:

  • 1 <= s.length <= 105
  • 1 <= maxLetters <= 26
  • 1 <= minSize <= maxSize <= min(26, s.length)
  • s consists of only lowercase English letters.
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: Given a string s, return the maximum number of occurrences of any substring under the following rules: The number of unique characters in the substring must be less than or equal to maxLetters. The substring size must be between minSize and maxSize inclusive.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Hash Map · Sliding Window

Example 1

"aababcaab"
2
3
4

Example 2

"aaaa"
1
3
3

Related Problems

  • Rearrange Characters to Make Target String (rearrange-characters-to-make-target-string)
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • Check out the constraints, (maxSize <=26).
  • This means you can explore all substrings in O(n * 26).
  • Find the Maximum Number of Occurrences of a Substring with bruteforce.
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1297: Maximum Number of Occurrences of a Substring
class Solution {
    public int maxFreq(String s, int maxLetters, int minSize, int maxSize) {
        int ans = 0;
        Map<String, Integer> cnt = new HashMap<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < s.length() - minSize + 1; ++i) {
            String t = s.substring(i, i + minSize);
            Set<Character> ss = new HashSet<>();
            for (int j = 0; j < minSize; ++j) {
                ss.add(t.charAt(j));
            }
            if (ss.size() <= maxLetters) {
                cnt.merge(t, 1, Integer::sum);
                ans = Math.max(ans, cnt.get(t));
            }
        }
        return ans;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n × m)
Space
O(n × m)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE
O(n × k) time
O(1) space

For each starting index, scan the next k elements to compute the window aggregate. There are n−k+1 starting positions, each requiring O(k) work, giving O(n × k) total. No extra space since we recompute from scratch each time.

SLIDING WINDOW
O(n) time
O(k) space

The window expands and contracts as we scan left to right. Each element enters the window at most once and leaves at most once, giving 2n total operations = O(n). Space depends on what we track inside the window (a hash map of at most k distinct elements, or O(1) for a fixed-size window).

Shortcut: Each element enters and exits the window once → O(n) amortized, regardless of window size.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Mutating counts without cleanup

Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.

Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.

Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.

Shrinking the window only once

Wrong move: Using `if` instead of `while` leaves the window invalid for multiple iterations.

Usually fails on: Over-limit windows stay invalid and produce wrong lengths/counts.

Fix: Shrink in a `while` loop until the invariant is valid again.