Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
Given a list of words, list of single letters (might be repeating) and score of every character.
Return the maximum score of any valid set of words formed by using the given letters (words[i] cannot be used two or more times).
It is not necessary to use all characters in letters and each letter can only be used once. Score of letters 'a', 'b', 'c', ... ,'z' is given by score[0], score[1], ... , score[25] respectively.
Example 1:
Input: words = ["dog","cat","dad","good"], letters = ["a","a","c","d","d","d","g","o","o"], score = [1,0,9,5,0,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0] Output: 23 Explanation: Score a=1, c=9, d=5, g=3, o=2 Given letters, we can form the words "dad" (5+1+5) and "good" (3+2+2+5) with a score of 23. Words "dad" and "dog" only get a score of 21.
Example 2:
Input: words = ["xxxz","ax","bx","cx"], letters = ["z","a","b","c","x","x","x"], score = [4,4,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,10] Output: 27 Explanation: Score a=4, b=4, c=4, x=5, z=10 Given letters, we can form the words "ax" (4+5), "bx" (4+5) and "cx" (4+5) with a score of 27. Word "xxxz" only get a score of 25.
Example 3:
Input: words = ["leetcode"], letters = ["l","e","t","c","o","d"], score = [0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0] Output: 0 Explanation: Letter "e" can only be used once.
Constraints:
1 <= words.length <= 141 <= words[i].length <= 151 <= letters.length <= 100letters[i].length == 1score.length == 260 <= score[i] <= 10words[i], letters[i] contains only lower case English letters.Problem summary: Given a list of words, list of single letters (might be repeating) and score of every character. Return the maximum score of any valid set of words formed by using the given letters (words[i] cannot be used two or more times). It is not necessary to use all characters in letters and each letter can only be used once. Score of letters 'a', 'b', 'c', ... ,'z' is given by score[0], score[1], ... , score[25] respectively.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Dynamic Programming · Backtracking · Bit Manipulation
["dog","cat","dad","good"] ["a","a","c","d","d","d","g","o","o"] [1,0,9,5,0,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
["xxxz","ax","bx","cx"] ["z","a","b","c","x","x","x"] [4,4,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,10]
["leetcode"] ["l","e","t","c","o","d"] [0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0]
maximum-good-people-based-on-statements)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1255: Maximum Score Words Formed by Letters
class Solution {
public int maxScoreWords(String[] words, char[] letters, int[] score) {
int[] cnt = new int[26];
for (int i = 0; i < letters.length; ++i) {
cnt[letters[i] - 'a']++;
}
int n = words.length;
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 1 << n; ++i) {
int[] cur = new int[26];
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
if (((i >> j) & 1) == 1) {
for (int k = 0; k < words[j].length(); ++k) {
cur[words[j].charAt(k) - 'a']++;
}
}
}
boolean ok = true;
int t = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < 26; ++j) {
if (cur[j] > cnt[j]) {
ok = false;
break;
}
t += cur[j] * score[j];
}
if (ok && ans < t) {
ans = t;
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1255: Maximum Score Words Formed by Letters
func maxScoreWords(words []string, letters []byte, score []int) (ans int) {
cnt := [26]int{}
for _, c := range letters {
cnt[c-'a']++
}
n := len(words)
for i := 0; i < 1<<n; i++ {
cur := [26]int{}
for j := 0; j < n; j++ {
if i>>j&1 == 1 {
for _, c := range words[j] {
cur[c-'a']++
}
}
}
ok := true
t := 0
for i, v := range cur {
if v > cnt[i] {
ok = false
break
}
t += v * score[i]
}
if ok && ans < t {
ans = t
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1255: Maximum Score Words Formed by Letters
class Solution:
def maxScoreWords(
self, words: List[str], letters: List[str], score: List[int]
) -> int:
cnt = Counter(letters)
n = len(words)
ans = 0
for i in range(1 << n):
cur = Counter(''.join([words[j] for j in range(n) if i >> j & 1]))
if all(v <= cnt[c] for c, v in cur.items()):
t = sum(v * score[ord(c) - ord('a')] for c, v in cur.items())
ans = max(ans, t)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1255: Maximum Score Words Formed by Letters
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn max_score_words(words: Vec<String>, letters: Vec<char>, score: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut count: Vec<i32> = vec![0; 26];
for c in letters {
count[(c as u8 - b'a') as usize] += 1;
}
let n = words.len();
let scores: Vec<i32> = words
.iter()
.map(|s| s.bytes().map(|b| score[(b - b'a') as usize]).sum())
.collect();
let mut res = 0;
Self::dfs(0, 0, &mut count, &mut res, &words, &scores, n);
res
}
fn dfs(
start: usize,
sum: i32,
count: &mut Vec<i32>,
max: &mut i32,
words: &[String],
scores: &[i32],
n: usize,
) {
if start == n {
*max = (*max).max(sum);
} else {
Self::dfs(start + 1, sum, count, max, words, scores, n);
Self::update(count, &words[start], -1);
if Self::check(count, &words[start]) {
Self::dfs(start + 1, sum + scores[start], count, max, words, scores, n);
}
Self::update(count, &words[start], 1);
}
}
fn update(count: &mut Vec<i32>, s: &str, val: i32) {
for c in s.chars() {
count[(c as u8 - b'a') as usize] += val;
}
}
fn check(count: &mut Vec<i32>, s: &str) -> bool {
for c in s.chars() {
if count[(c as u8 - b'a') as usize] < 0 {
return false;
}
}
true
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let words = vec_string!["dog", "cat", "dad", "good"];
let letters = vec!['a', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'd', 'd', 'g', 'o', 'o'];
let score = vec![
1, 0, 9, 5, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
];
let res = 23;
assert_eq!(Solution::max_score_words(words, letters, score), res);
let words = vec_string!["xxxz", "ax", "bx", "cx"];
let letters = vec!['z', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'x', 'x', 'x'];
let score = vec![
4, 4, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, 10,
];
let res = 27;
assert_eq!(Solution::max_score_words(words, letters, score), res);
let words = vec_string!["leetcode"];
let letters = vec!['l', 'e', 't', 'c', 'o', 'd'];
let score = vec![
0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
];
let res = 0;
assert_eq!(Solution::max_score_words(words, letters, score), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1255: Maximum Score Words Formed by Letters
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1255: Maximum Score Words Formed by Letters
// class Solution {
// public int maxScoreWords(String[] words, char[] letters, int[] score) {
// int[] cnt = new int[26];
// for (int i = 0; i < letters.length; ++i) {
// cnt[letters[i] - 'a']++;
// }
// int n = words.length;
// int ans = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < 1 << n; ++i) {
// int[] cur = new int[26];
// for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
// if (((i >> j) & 1) == 1) {
// for (int k = 0; k < words[j].length(); ++k) {
// cur[words[j].charAt(k) - 'a']++;
// }
// }
// }
// boolean ok = true;
// int t = 0;
// for (int j = 0; j < 26; ++j) {
// if (cur[j] > cnt[j]) {
// ok = false;
// break;
// }
// t += cur[j] * score[j];
// }
// if (ok && ans < t) {
// ans = t;
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.
Wrong move: Mutable state leaks between branches.
Usually fails on: Later branches inherit selections from earlier branches.
Fix: Always revert state changes immediately after recursive call.