Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
Let the function f(s) be the frequency of the lexicographically smallest character in a non-empty string s. For example, if s = "dcce" then f(s) = 2 because the lexicographically smallest character is 'c', which has a frequency of 2.
You are given an array of strings words and another array of query strings queries. For each query queries[i], count the number of words in words such that f(queries[i]) < f(W) for each W in words.
Return an integer array answer, where each answer[i] is the answer to the ith query.
Example 1:
Input: queries = ["cbd"], words = ["zaaaz"]
Output: [1]
Explanation: On the first query we have f("cbd") = 1, f("zaaaz") = 3 so f("cbd") < f("zaaaz").
Example 2:
Input: queries = ["bbb","cc"], words = ["a","aa","aaa","aaaa"]
Output: [1,2]
Explanation: On the first query only f("bbb") < f("aaaa"). On the second query both f("aaa") and f("aaaa") are both > f("cc").
Constraints:
1 <= queries.length <= 20001 <= words.length <= 20001 <= queries[i].length, words[i].length <= 10queries[i][j], words[i][j] consist of lowercase English letters.Problem summary: Let the function f(s) be the frequency of the lexicographically smallest character in a non-empty string s. For example, if s = "dcce" then f(s) = 2 because the lexicographically smallest character is 'c', which has a frequency of 2. You are given an array of strings words and another array of query strings queries. For each query queries[i], count the number of words in words such that f(queries[i]) < f(W) for each W in words. Return an integer array answer, where each answer[i] is the answer to the ith query.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Binary Search
["cbd"] ["zaaaz"]
["bbb","cc"] ["a","aa","aaa","aaaa"]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1170: Compare Strings by Frequency of the Smallest Character
class Solution {
public int[] numSmallerByFrequency(String[] queries, String[] words) {
int n = words.length;
int[] nums = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
nums[i] = f(words[i]);
}
Arrays.sort(nums);
int m = queries.length;
int[] ans = new int[m];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
int x = f(queries[i]);
int l = 0, r = n;
while (l < r) {
int mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (nums[mid] > x) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
ans[i] = n - l;
}
return ans;
}
private int f(String s) {
int[] cnt = new int[26];
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) {
++cnt[s.charAt(i) - 'a'];
}
for (int x : cnt) {
if (x > 0) {
return x;
}
}
return 0;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1170: Compare Strings by Frequency of the Smallest Character
func numSmallerByFrequency(queries []string, words []string) (ans []int) {
f := func(s string) int {
cnt := [26]int{}
for _, c := range s {
cnt[c-'a']++
}
for _, x := range cnt {
if x > 0 {
return x
}
}
return 0
}
n := len(words)
nums := make([]int, n)
for i, w := range words {
nums[i] = f(w)
}
sort.Ints(nums)
for _, q := range queries {
x := f(q)
ans = append(ans, n-sort.SearchInts(nums, x+1))
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1170: Compare Strings by Frequency of the Smallest Character
class Solution:
def numSmallerByFrequency(self, queries: List[str], words: List[str]) -> List[int]:
def f(s: str) -> int:
cnt = Counter(s)
return next(cnt[c] for c in ascii_lowercase if cnt[c])
n = len(words)
nums = sorted(f(w) for w in words)
return [n - bisect_right(nums, f(q)) for q in queries]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1170: Compare Strings by Frequency of the Smallest Character
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn f(s: &str) -> usize {
let mut count = vec![0; 26];
let mut min = b'z';
for b in s.bytes() {
min = min.min(b);
count[(b - b'a') as usize] += 1;
}
count[(min - b'a') as usize]
}
fn num_smaller_by_frequency(queries: Vec<String>, words: Vec<String>) -> Vec<i32> {
let f_words: Vec<usize> = words.iter().map(|s| Self::f(s)).collect();
let mut counts = vec![0; 12];
for f in f_words {
counts[f] += 1;
}
for i in (1..10).rev() {
counts[i] += counts[i + 1];
}
queries
.iter()
.map(|s| Self::f(s))
.map(|f| counts[f + 1])
.collect()
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let queries = vec_string!["cbd"];
let words = vec_string!["zaaaz"];
let res = vec![1];
assert_eq!(Solution::num_smaller_by_frequency(queries, words), res);
let queries = vec_string!["bbb", "cc"];
let words = vec_string!["a", "aa", "aaa", "aaaa"];
let res = vec![1, 2];
assert_eq!(Solution::num_smaller_by_frequency(queries, words), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1170: Compare Strings by Frequency of the Smallest Character
function numSmallerByFrequency(queries: string[], words: string[]): number[] {
const f = (s: string): number => {
const cnt = new Array(26).fill(0);
for (const c of s) {
cnt[c.charCodeAt(0) - 'a'.charCodeAt(0)]++;
}
return cnt.find(x => x > 0);
};
const nums = words.map(f).sort((a, b) => a - b);
const ans: number[] = [];
for (const q of queries) {
const x = f(q);
let l = 0,
r = nums.length;
while (l < r) {
const mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (nums[mid] > x) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
ans.push(nums.length - l);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.